Felony Friday: In New York, Annoying Someone Is No Longer A Felony

Everyone has an annoying friend, or at least an annoying acquaintance that doesn’t understand common courtesy or how to conduct themselves appropriately in public settings. Some people are unlucky enough to know of or to be harassed by an annoying enemy that pursues a personal vendetta well past the point of acceptable interaction. Annoying people have a gift, or curse depending on your perspective, that precludes them from feeling any guilt for their selfish behavior.Most people will not hesitate to admit that they attempt to limit their exposure to annoying individuals. In extreme cases, sometimes the targets of annoying people are forced to change their phone number or email address in order to cut off a relationship with a particularly bothersome person that neglects to understand their company or correspondence is not wanted.Being an annoying person in New York used to be enough to warrant a felony charge, until this week. On Tuesday the Court of Appeals in Albany ruled against a statute that made it a felony to communicate with someone “in a manner likely to cause annoyance or alarm.”The NY Times reports:

In striking down the statute on aggravated harassment dealing with speech that was merely annoying or alarming, the judges unanimously ruled that the law was unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. They cited another court’s ruling that “any proscription of pure speech must be sharply limited to words which, by their utterance alone, inflict injury or tend naturally to evoke immediate violence.” Mere annoying speech, the lingua franca of many New Yorkers, was not enough.The Manhattan district attorney, Cyrus R. Vance Jr., called the aggravated harassment statute “one of the most important tools we have to protect victims of, among other serious crimes, stalking and domestic violence.”“Last year,” Mr. Vance continued in a statement, “there were approximately 900 people charged in Manhattan with this crime; many of these cases are pending. We will now work with advocates, our partners in law enforcement, and state lawmakers to address the potential implications of this ruling.”

How can there be a crime if no property is stolen or damaged and no violent acts have occured? The First Amendment protects free speech, but the Bill of Rights should not be the only method used to validate that speech should not be punished with force by the State. The principles of natural law tell us that if you have not aggressed upon another's property or person, then you have not committed a crime. The act of uttering annoying speech or sending pestering emails does not violate the rights of other individuals. This doesn't stop individuals or groups from using voluntary contracts to keep "annoying" behaviors out of their businesses or social gatherings.There is nothing wrong with certain forms of speech being banned by private organizations. Companies enact rules to prevent harassment in the workplace, which results in discipline or termination if broken. Speech and annoying behavior can be regulated by private entities where a voluntary contract has been signed in exchange for access to their products or services. Social media sites such as Facebook and Twitter have terms of service agreements which do not allow certain behaviors. Some of these prohibited behaviors are solely based on the preferences of the owners and would be categorized as only mildly annoying to some people.The State should have no role in regulating speech - annoying or otherwise -  and certainly should not be locking individuals behind bars for acting “in a manner likely to cause annoyance or alarm.” Private entities, on the other hand, should be free to dictate the type and amount of "annoying" behaviors that are allowed to fester within their organization or business.Check out our past editions of Felony Friday!The Lions of Liberty are on Twitter, Facebook & Google+Receive access to ALL of our EXCLUSIVE bonus audio content – including “Conspiracy Corner”, “Degenerate Gamblers” and the “League of Liberty Podcast” by joining the Lions of Liberty Pride and supporting us on Patreon!

Subscribe to our weekly digest!

Previous
Previous

The Morning Roar: AT&T To Buy DirecTV For $48 Billion, Swiss Voters Overwhelmingly Reject Proposal To Raise Minimum Wage, And CA Gov. Uses Wildfires To Lecture On Climate Change

Next
Next

The Morning Roar: 74% Of Obamacare Enrollees Already Insured, Pentagon Can't Seem to Figure Out Its Spending, and USDA Wants .40Cal Submachine Guns